
In 2010-11 Australia’s coal-rich Queensland region was hit hard by flooding events of historic proportions. They were the result of one of the strongest La Niña phenomena since 1917. Almost 80 % of the entire state was declared flood-affected. The state’s mining sectors, in particular, suffered huge losses. According to estimates, the 2010-11 floods led to a total loss in excess of USD 5.15 billion to Queensland’s gross state product that included more than USD 2.06 billion in lost coal export earnings.
The growing number and impact of these kinds of extreme weather events has led to increasing awareness in the extractives industries of the potential negative impacts of climate change. The industry has started thinking about its own vulnerabilities and the risks climate change could pose. However, while there has been research on the role of the extractives sector as a major emitter of green house gases, there has been little research and debate that takes a more comprehensive look at the links between climate change impacts and mining. The report Climate Change and Mining. A Foreign Policy Perspective tries to fill this gap by shedding some light on these links and providing an overview of the complex challenges around extractive resources in the context of climate change.
It argues that foreign policy makers should pay more attention to the links between mining and climate change because
These links pose significant risks not only for the extractives sector, but also the larger economy that are shared by resource-dependent and resource-rich countries.
Against this background, foreign policy should take a more active role in addressing these risks and engage with the extractives sector as part of its climate diplomacy efforts. Based on an analyses of current policy approaches and initiatives, the report provides four recommendations and policy options:
1) Climate-proof critical minerals policies and security of supply strategies that up to now have largely neglected climate risks
2) Actively contribute to improving social and environmental standards in the extractives sector to address climate risks and augment the resilience of the sector
3) Support national and regional dialogues on responsible mining to increase transparency, improve consultations for prior decision-making and prevent conflicts
4) Proactively use extractives as a topic for climate diplomacy to link climate change to the broader development discourse of a country or region.
Together these actions could form the starting point for a more strategic climate diplomacy approach towards mining.
As we step into 2020, time has come to implement the Paris Agreement and raise climate ambition, but the geopolitical tide seems to be against it. The best way forward at this crucial juncture might be to forge a ‘climate coalition of the willing’ – recognising and streamlining actions of all actors at all levels.
For the first time in the survey’s 10-year outlook, the top five global risks in terms of likelihood are all environmental. They are: extreme weather events, failure of climate change mitigation and adaptation, major natural disasters, major biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse, and human-made environmental damage and disasters.
Millions of people across Sub-Saharan Africa could face grave hunger in the first half of 2020 because of armed conflict, political instability and climate change-linked disasters, a report says.
The report published by the UN World Food Programme (WFP) this month says that the countries affected will require life-saving food assistance and investment to prevent humanitarian catastrophes.
Australia is currently experiencing one of its worst bushfire seasons, with swathes of the southern and eastern coastal regions having been ablaze for weeks. As the fires have spread, there has been extensive media coverage both nationally and internationally documenting – and debating – their impacts. This Carbon Brief overview summarises how the fires – and the political response to them – have been covered by the media.