Climate Change and Mining: a Foreign Policy Perspective
In 2010-11 Australia’s coal-rich Queensland region was hit hard by flooding events of historic proportions. They were the result of one of the strongest La Niña phenomena since 1917. Almost 80 % of the entire state was declared flood-affected. The state’s mining sectors, in particular, suffered huge losses. According to estimates, the 2010-11 floods led to a total loss in excess of USD 5.15 billion to Queensland’s gross state product that included more than USD 2.06 billion in lost coal export earnings.
The growing number and impact of these kinds of extreme weather events has led to increasing awareness in the extractives industries of the potential negative impacts of climate change. The industry has started thinking about its own vulnerabilities and the risks climate change could pose. However, while there has been research on the role of the extractives sector as a major emitter of green house gases, there has been little research and debate that takes a more comprehensive look at the links between climate change impacts and mining. The report Climate Change and Mining. A Foreign Policy Perspective tries to fill this gap by shedding some light on these links and providing an overview of the complex challenges around extractive resources in the context of climate change.
It argues that foreign policy makers should pay more attention to the links between mining and climate change because
- the mining sector is one of the major emitters of greenhouse gases and it produces fossil energy resources that also significantly contribute to global CO2 emissions,
- mining is a sector that is particularly vulnerable to climate change,
- mining is a significant contributor to the development of many countries around the world, in particular many developing and emerging economies, and
- developed, industrialised economies are dependent on functioning supply chains and security of supply of the resources that drive their economies.
These links pose significant risks not only for the extractives sector, but also the larger economy that are shared by resource-dependent and resource-rich countries.
Against this background, foreign policy should take a more active role in addressing these risks and engage with the extractives sector as part of its climate diplomacy efforts. Based on an analyses of current policy approaches and initiatives, the report provides four recommendations and policy options:
1) Climate-proof critical minerals policies and security of supply strategies that up to now have largely neglected climate risks
2) Actively contribute to improving social and environmental standards in the extractives sector to address climate risks and augment the resilience of the sector
3) Support national and regional dialogues on responsible mining to increase transparency, improve consultations for prior decision-making and prevent conflicts
4) Proactively use extractives as a topic for climate diplomacy to link climate change to the broader development discourse of a country or region.
Together these actions could form the starting point for a more strategic climate diplomacy approach towards mining.
2nd Climate Diplomacy Week 2018 - Highlights
Climate Diplomacy Week is a perfect opportunity to highlight positive climate action, set new goals and engage more and new actors in the fight against the devastating impacts of climate change. Each year, the week has its own character. Climate Diplomacy Week 2018, from 24-30 September, was marked by action – throughout the world, civil society participated in inspiring educational activities and engaged the wider public in the climate cause.
Canada and EU add climate clause to trade pact
In a move that underscored Donald Trump’s isolation on trade and climate change, the two major economies inserted a reference to the Paris Agreement into Ceta.
Fourteen Latin American and Caribbean countries made history at the UN General Assembly on September 27 by signing the Escazú Agreement, a regional accord on public participation and access to information and justice in environmental affairs. It is the first region-wide agreement of its kind and has been touted a big step forward in recognising the rights of environmental defenders. Signatories now need to ratify the Agreement internally before it can enter into force.
Is SAARC prepared to combat climate change and its security risks?
Though India is now pushing for BIMSTEC, geography dictates that it cannot ignore SAARC. South Asia is extremely vulnerable to a range of climate impacts, ranging from shrinking glaciers and water scarcity to floods and rising sea levels. Responding to these risks is a complex task, also because often impacts affect more than one country and their severity exceeds the capacity of national governments. Climate change creates new challenges for regional organisations, and simultaneously increases their relevance.