Senior military officials from around the world have publicly warned of the security risks posed by extreme weather events, which are becoming increasingly aggravated by climate change.
Following flooding across the UK this month, Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti, former Royal Navy aircraft carrier commander and chief UK climate envoy in 2013, stated that the UK government can no longer afford to disregard the importance of acting on climate change.
In the wake of UK’s disrupted power, train lines and homes from flooding, Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti told website RTCC that climate change goes beyond borders, and that countries cannot “pull up the drawbridge” to stop its impacts.
His stark warning was also repeated this week by Germany’s army, the Bundeswehr. Hartmund Behrend, the German Army’s climate risk expert, stated that climate change should be handled as a foreign policy issue, and that it is now a priority for the Bundeswehr. He told RTCC: “Key environmental and resource constraints, including health risks, climate change, water security and increasing energy needs will further shape the future security environment in areas of concern to NATO and have the potential to significantly affect NATO planning and operations.”
Global security threat
The opinion is echoed by Australian military too, where last week the country’s Chief of Army Lieutenant-General David Morrison stated climate change and related disaster management must be worked into all future military plans. During an address in Sydney, he said: “You have to look at the region with a number of low-lying islands to I think be confident in drawing conclusions that there will be a role for the military as a result. I think that the most likely role for the military however will be in providing immediate assistance for humanitarian and disaster relief.”
Lieutenant-General Morrison’s comments came just days after the US Secretary of State John Kerry called climate change a "weapon of mass destruction" during a speech he gave in Indonesia, foreshadowing the global military chorus for action to curb climate change and its costly impacts.
For the complete article, please see The Climate Group.
Linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans across the Latin American landmass has often been presented as one of the holy grails of development for the region. While China’s idea of a ‘Nicaraguan Canal’ has made headlines globally, another major infrastructure project is in the works further south: the Bi-Oceanic Railway. The idea has already spurred transboundary environmental cooperation, but the public is still in the dark.
Using a progressive environmental security concept can help to tackle a range of environmental issues related to armed conflict, such as deforestation, loss of biodiversity, tensions over natural resources, conflict pollution, and damage to ecosystems. The environment can actually play a role in peacebuilding. This article briefly outlines why such an inclusive and environmental protection approach is needed and how it could be implemented.
Climate action and free trade have been perceived as contrary agendas for a long time. Despite more and more governments seeing tremendous potential for win-win outcomes, aligning trade and climate has become harder. This is due to changes in our current geopolitical landscape, as Christian Hübner explains in light of the upcoming G20 summit.
Human activity has caused the temperature of the Earth and its atmosphere to rise by about 1°C above pre-industrial levels, triggering fundamental changes to the planet’s physical and social landscapes. On 8 October an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that temperatures were rising faster than expected, and that 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels could occur as early as 2030.