Source: EurActiv
04 February 2011 - Major rare earth-consuming countries should join forces to diversify their supply sources and develop substitutes for such materials, Keiichi Kawakami of the Japanese Ministry for Industry said yesterday (3 February).
Following the adoption of EU policy plans on raw materials on Wednesday (2 February), all major countries have devised rare earths strategies and "it is high time" to strengthen international cooperation, said Kawakami.
The deputy director-general of the Manufacturing Industries Bureau at the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) was in the European Parliament to present Japan's Rare Earth Elements (REE) Strategy.
The strategy was adopted in October 2010 after China, which accounts for 97% of world production of rare earths, halted shipments to Japan over a territorial dispute last September.
China has been gradually reducing export quotas for rare earths since 2005 as part of an effort to retain more of the minerals for domestic industry, a policy that has caused alarm among nations that depend on them for high-tech and military applications. The country is now mulling a full export ban as of 2015.
These developments have also caused concern also among worldwide manufacturers of high-tech products, ranging from computers to electric car batteries and wind turbines, and have fuelled EU worries about access to materials.
The US Department of Energy (DOE) adopted a Critical Materials Strategy in December 2010, with a special focus on clean energy.
Triangular cooperation
Kawakami noted that the United States and Japan had already held a roundtable on rare earths in late November 2010 and are to renew the experience later this spring. EU and US officials met to discuss the same topic in early December.
"All of the [rare earth-]consuming countries' problems need to be solved through cooperation," said Kawakami, suggesting that countries like Japan, the US and the EU build a "triangular cooperation" network.
He said that the focus should be on better understanding the supply chain, strengthening efforts to diversify supply sources, increasing recycling, and developing both substitute materials and new technologies that reduce the amount of rare earths used.
Cooperation is also needed to encourage China to "establish quotas sufficient to prevent adverse effects on the world industrial supply chain," Kawakami added.
For the complete article, please see EurActiv.
The scope of national security is expanding beyond violent threats to encompass a broader array of dangers. In an article for World Politics Review, CFR's Stewart M. Patrick assesses the implications of COVID-19 and climate change for the theory and practice of national security.
Although there is no causality nor direct and automatic link between climate change and conflict, we can see that climate change can intensify conflict drivers and make it harder to find stability. The online workshop "Climate change, conflict and fragility: Increasing resilience against climate-fragility risks", organised by the European Peacebuilding Liaison Office (EPLO) and adelphi, looked into this complex relationship.
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous parallels have been drawn between this health crisis and the climate crisis. Science plays an important role in advising decision makers on how to ensure sustainable crisis management and a precautionary approach to avoid harmful repercussions, particularly where we do not yet know all the consequences of our actions. [...]
Decarbonisation won’t come as fast as the pandemic. But if fossil fuel exporters are not prepared for it, they will face an enduring crisis. The EU can help.