Policies to protect the environment or mitigate the negative effects of climate change can have unintended negative consequences for local communities and lead to conflicts over the use of natural resources and the focus of local development policies. In a new series of case studies, the ECC Factbook analyses conflicts in connection with conservation projects.
Forest and marine reserves play an important role in preserving natural environments, wildlife and vegetation. However, they may sometimes be at odds with the interests of the communities that depend on those environments for their livelihoods. While many conservation projects include provisions for compensating local communities and creating new economic opportunities – notably in the eco-tourism sector – these are not always effectively implemented or fail to meet the demands and expectations of local people. The resulting tensions can become a source of conflict and in some cases even violence.
In Kenya, for example, plans to create a forest reserve were met with strong resistance by local communities. The Loita Forest, located in Kenya’s southern Naroc County, has immense economic and cultural value for local Maasai pastoralists. With its cooler and more humid climate, it serves as an important fall back area during the dry season and in times of drought. Transforming the forest into a conservation area – and thereby restricting access for livestock – would have compromised the livelihoods of local herders and increased their vulnerability to extreme weather events, which have become more frequent in the region.
Similarly, the creation of a marine conservation area in eastern Tanzania, has led to conflict with local fishermen. In 1995 the government of Tanzania established the Mafia Island Marine Park southeast of Zanzibar Island in an attempt to protect biodiversity off its shores. However, the park’s strict regulations on fishing and the use of other coastal resources have been a thorn in the side of local communities that depend heavily on corals, fish and mangroves to earn a living. Violent incidents between enforcement officers and fishermen who are not respecting the park’s regulations have occasionally occurred.
As a final example, the management of the Cainama National Park in south-eastern Venezuela has led to tense relations between the park’s management and the indigenous Permon people. Contentious issues include conflicts over the management of touristic activities, fears of cultural alienation among local people and the indigenous communities’ customary use of slash and burn agriculture, which is considered a major risk by environmental managers.
These examples highlight some of the risks associated with conservation projects and the need for a more inclusive and conflict-sensitive approach. Furthermore, they show that local tensions can be eased by more actively involving local communities in the management of protected areas and their natural resources. Efforts to improve local services, harness indigenous knowledge and promote alternative livelihoods, notably eco-tourism, can also make a difference, but only if they are conducted in a consistent, fair and transparent manner.
Central Asian countries have long been competing over the water resources of the Syr Darya and Amu Darya river basins. Despite political commitment to cooperation, the policies of the five Central Asian republics – Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan – have largely been driven by uncoordinated and partly contradicting national strategies. This focus on short-term national interests entails significant financial costs and major risks for the future development of the whole region.
The destruction caused by Cyclone Ockhi in South Asia portends what a ‘climate-changed’ world has in store for humankind, especially taking into consideration the adverse human security implications of such disasters that have to be addressed urgently. Dhanasree Jayaram argues that planetary security in this context can be best ensured at the regional level.
In November 2017, the U.S. government released its first ever Global Water Strategy – to our knowledge also the first of its kind globally. The opening page cites President Trump claiming that ‘[w]ater may be the most important issue we face for the next generation’. This priority may surprise observers of the current U.S. administration.
The Lake Chad region experiences a multitude of crises: lack of employment and education opportunities, resource scarcity and violent conflict, all exacerbated by the effects of climate change, making the Lake Chad region Africa’s largest humanitarian emergency. At the margins of the Planetary Security Conference 2017, we spoke with the independent conflict adviser Chitra Nagarajan about the region’s future.