The EU and its Member States have been practical pioneers of climate diplomacy for many years, but what has been learned up until now? Which initiatives and approaches are worth being replicated?
The EU and its Member States have been practical pioneers of climate diplomacy for many years. The emergence and evolution of climate diplomacy as a new strand of foreign policy illustrates the change diplomatic practices undergo in terms of topics, forums, instruments and actors involved. In its short history, a plethora of hands-on experiences with innovative approaches have been adopted.
A side event at COP23 on 6 November 2017 aimed at showcasing successful examples of EU climate diplomacy and learning from EU initiatives around the world. It was organized by adelphi in cooperation with the European External Action Service and the German Federal Foreign Office and served as an opportunity to engage with European and global civil society.
During the side event, Lena Ruthner from the consultancy ICF International shared key results from a study on the effectiveness of the EU’s climate diplomacy in the past, and gave two strategic recommendations. Firstly, the EU and its member states should align their policies with the ambitious targets of the Paris Agreement, and secondly, Europe should apply the ‘Team EU’-approach to its climate diplomacy, whereby both the Commission and EU Member states act collectively, in order to support greater alignment in the context of all external climate action. If European climate diplomacy in the future wants to motivate other countries as well as non-state actors, Lena Ruther concluded, it should leverage the value of its assets and networks and use them strategically.
Engaging non-state actors will indeed be key for achieving the ambitious <2° global warming target set out in the Paris Agreement, as they contribute to a better understanding of climate politics in different regions and help to spread innovation, to implement specific measures or to ensure that social and equity dimensions are incorporated.
Caroline Lambert, Climate and Environment Counsellor at EU Delegation to Australia, summarised the ‘ecosystem approach’ which was used by her delegation for a series of climate security events during European Climate Diplomacy Week in June 2017. This approach is based around the conviction that, rather than engaging in top-level dialogue between ambassadors, climate diplomacy can have a more lasting, sustainable impact if it facilitates exchange among the entire ‘ecosystem’ of climate stakeholders between countries – be it business, civil society and academia, regulators and policy-makers, or journalists. The delegation supported exchange by various innovative formats, including film-screenings, an exhibition and role-plays that allowed visitors to learn in a hands-on and experiential way.
In summer 2016, the EU High Representative Federica Mogherini revealed the long-awaited Global Strategy “Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe”. It sets out the EU's “core interests and principles for engaging in the world” and aims very much at providing a holistic (“global”) approach. The strategy seeks to integrate EU climate diplomacy into the EU’s overall foreign and security policy thinking and recognizes the strategic importance of climate change as a root cause of conflict, calling it a “threat multiplier that catalyses water and food scarcity, pandemics and displacement”. It calls for pre-emptive peacebuilding and diplomacy, and for enhancing energy and environmental resilience. However, as Pascal Delisle from the European External Action Service pointed out, it remains a major challenge to integrate climate diplomacy into the entire foreign policy portfolio.
An area where progress has been made in this regard is the climate-security nexus – one of the three strands of EU climate diplomacy. Neil Wood from the European Union Military Staff (EUMS) showcased how overarching strategies have already been broken down and put into practice. In order to increase the number of military personnel at senior and middle-management level who are “climate change literate” and who can engage in dialogue, both within government and with the general public, concrete actions are pursued:
These are but small steps in the paramount effort to connect innovative climate diplomacy initiatives and practitioners and facilitate improving, replicating, and scaling up of such new formats and approaches.
While COP-23 took many steps in the right direction, there are a plethora of issues at stake for developing countries that need to be ironed out, such as transparency, pre-2020 climate action, and loss and damage, before the post-2020 international climate policy is rolled out. Dhanasree Jayaram argues that the developing bloc needs to unite for a better and equitable world.
How can we move from analysis to action on climate-security risks? The third annual Planetary Security Conference 2017 will take place on December 12th and 13th 2017 in The Hague and aims at providing new answers to this question.
On November 17, adelphi hosted a high-level panel discussion on “How to prevent climate security risks?” at the German Pavilion at COP23. The panel discussion was an opportunity to take stock of what has been achieved and to deepen the discussion on how to prevent climate-related risks and incorporate them into policy planning.
An environmentally unsustainable system produces instability, which inevitably leads to insecurity. This is the hypothesis of a substantial new report by WWF France, titled “Sustainability, Stability, Security”. The report argues that only integrated responses can work, and looks into the role of climate diplomacy for promoting action on climate, security and development issues…