On 1 December 2016, adelphi researchers and the former Minister of Environment of Peru, Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, discussed the challenges and opportunities of a low-carbon transition during the closing event of the ECC Exhibition at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru (PUCP).
The Exhibition Environment Conflict and Cooperation (ECC) in Lima ended with a panel discussion on Low-Carbon Economic Transition: the Role of International Cooperation. It was co-organised by adelphi, the Peruvian NGO Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental (SPDA) and the university organisation Clima de Cambios, with support of the German Federal Foreign Office. The event welcomed speakers Daria Ivleva (Research Analyst, adelphi), Stephan Wolters (Senior Project Manager, adelphi), and Manuel Pulgar-Vidal (Climate and Energy Lead, WWF and former environmental minister of Peru).
Daria Ivleva thanked the project partners and the event participants for the opportunity to show the exhibition at PUCP, as this kind of public outreach “is one of the ways to enhance transboundary cooperation in order to support better resource management and to show the possibilities for collaboration”.
Ivleva maintained that the ECC Exhibition is highly relevant in the South American context, because, despite the region’s diversity, it faces common challenges, such as land use change, forest degradation, water resource management, urbanisation, all of which lead to the question how development choices exert pressure on environmental resources. The specific exhibition module on South America looks into these issues, and also offers insights on the water, energy and food nexus. These interconnections are crucial to understand the impacts of climate change.
She stated: “We have to reflect on the development paths we follow, including lifestyles and economic structures we maintain, in terms of their environmental and societal impacts, as well as tensions which may arise and that can potentially undermine the legitimacy basis of the political system itself.”
Stephan Wolters spoke of the importance of a low-carbon economic transition and the implications for the implementation of the Paris Agreement. Existing national mitigation commitments are not sufficient to keep the global temperature increase below 2°C. “There is still much to do, and this is also a task for international cooperation and climate diplomacy,” he said, adding “I do have hope that we will be able to raise ambition, for economic reasons: according to studies, up to 90 % of the measures to embark on the 2°C pathway are net-beneficial for national economies.”
Wolters highlighted the fact that more economic mitigation measures are possible in Peru than the NDC accounts for, which means, there is potential for intensifying climate action. “The transition is not easy and many challenges persist, for instance, path dependency (is the tendency to maintain the present economic equilibrium, because a change would imply additional effort),” he pointed out.
Manuel Pulgar-Vidal gave a comprehensive overview of the international climate policy framework and its latest developments, especially the Paris Agreement. Referring to the Agreement, he insisted that “one has to understand it in its entirety: what it means to have finally reached this agreement and what this achievement represents”. At the same time, the future of the Agreement depends on the same elements that made it possible. “The one million question is whether the Paris Agreement is a good agreement. And my answer to this is that it definitely is, because it includes the right elements to maintain a long-term perspective. Obviously, it does not solve all the problems immediately, but it does establish a process that puts the world on the path of gradual compliance with the objectives of the Agreement.”
At the end, Pulgar-Vidal highlighted the role of science in climate politics. “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was not only able to provide a more reliable scientific knowledge base, but also to give policy recommendations, which I think is fundamental: to turn science into a means for political decision-making.”
Explore the online version of the exhibition. Here you can find out more about environmental challenges, specifically in Latin America.
Since 2005, the ECC exhibition visited over 40 cities in 17 countries. It was conceived and realised by adelphi as a touring exhibition at the initiative of the German Federal Foreign Office, and is currently part of the Climate Diplomacy initiative. The regional module on South America was developed in collaboration with Fundación Futuro Latinoamericano (FFLA).
This article is available in Spanish on the website of Clima de Cambios. You can also find more impressions from the closing event on Flickr and Facebook.
The surge in the frequency and intensity of climate change impacts has raised the alarm about how this could hamper coastal activities. Several critical ports in the Indo-Pacific region are hubs of international trade and commerce and at the same time vulnerable to typhoons, taller waves and erosion. India’s climate diplomacy at the regional level could activate climate-resilient pathways for port development and management.
After an 18-month stretch without a White House science adviser – the longest any modern president has gone without a science adviser – Trump appoints extreme weather expert Kelvin Droegemeier to the post. Kelvin Droegemeier is vice president for research at the University of Oklahoma and a climate change scientist. His selection was widely welcomed.
Climate change threatens conflict and poverty in the Arab region, according to the UN Development Programme (UNDP). In a report published last week, the agency suggested climate risks could derail development gains, such as the decrease in infant mortality and the achievement of near universal primary education.
The links between climate change and security have started entering regional resolutions through the UN Security Council. Germany, elected for a seat on the Council in 2019-20, will again prioritize climate-related security risks as one of its main agendas. What prospects does a renewed engagement on climate security risks offer and is there scope for preventive participation?