Source: afrol News
14 May - Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda have signed a controversial deal to regulate and share the waters of River Nile, despite protests from downstream nations Sudan and Egypt. Ethiopia at the same time opened its first major dam on the Nile.
The countries of the Nile Basin have negotiated for 13 years to reach a new agreement regulating the use of Nile waters. The deal was to replace previous agreements, from 1929 and 1959, that give Egypt and Sudan control over about 90 percent of the Nile's water and was seen as a colonial relic unfavourable to upstream nations.
But the negotiations failed as Sudan and Egypt rejected proposals more favourable to the countries sources to Nile waters. Dismayed by the lengthy and fruitless negotiations, most upstream nations, led by Ethiopia and Uganda, decided to sign the agreement without the participation of Egypt and Sudan today.
The agreement thus was signed in Entebbe, Uganda, today, by officials from Nile source countries Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda. Kenya, while not signing the deal, issued a statement of support.
The new Nile agreement calls for experts to determine how to fairly share the Nile's water resources. It also opens up for a wider use of Nile waters by upstream nations, in theory opening up for projects that have been stalled for a decade due to the unclear legal situation.
But the agreement does not end the conflict, where Ethiopia and Egypt have been the main contenders. The lush and green mountains of Ethiopia contribute with 86 percent of the Nile's water, but Egyptian officials have already indicated they will take legal steps to prevent Ethiopia from widening its use of these waters as Cairo does not accept the new agreement.
The Egyptian government today reacted negatively to the signing, saying the new deal would not apply to Egypt or to Sudan. Cairo authorities announced they would take legal and diplomatic steps to stop the deal, saying the 1929 and 1959 agreements were still legally binding all parties.
Egypt's Water Minister in a statement added that his country in any case must be given special and wide rights to Nile waters. He recalled that the Nile provides Egypt with 96 percent of its water, while the other Nile Basin countries rely on the Nile for no more than three percent of their water needs. Less access to Nile waters would impede growth in Egypt, he added.
The Cairo government is already looking for diplomatic support to slash the new Nile deal as null and void. Diplomats from the European Union earlier this week had urged upstream nations not to sign the agreement without the support of Egypt and Sudan. Uganda and Ethiopia however hold Egypt is still welcome to sign the agreement.
Ethiopia, a country regularly experiencing droughts and famines, has been the main propagator of a new Nile Basin agreement, pointing to the fact that the country is strongly under-developed and needy in terms of water and electricity developments. Ethiopia and Egypt have a rivalry going back centuries, with officials in Cairo and Addis Ababa highly suspicious of each other.
For the complete article, please see afrol News.
Although water is an essential input for agriculture and industrial production, it is also scarce in many regions. When it crosses international borders via shared rivers, lakes and aquifers, it can become a source of conflict and contention. Yet while water can be a source of instability, especially in the face of climate change, it can also be a source or catalyst for cooperation and even peace.
The Gulf Cooperation Council’s grid operator is studying the feasibility of a cable to Ethiopia, which would run through currently war-torn Yemen.
Small Island States will be facing dramatically higher adaptation costs to build resilience against the kind of impacts the IPCC projects in its most recent Special Report. Thoriq Imbrahim, former Environment and Energy Minister of the Maldives, urges the international community to attend to the political demands of countries particularly exposed to the impacts of climate change and also confront loss and damage with renewed urgency.
Three years after the talks that delivered the Paris Agreement, the world is gathering in Poland to take stock of the progress that has been made and to raise its ambitions. But as new nationalist leaders take power, has the world lost its appetite for climate action?