Source: afrol News
14 May - Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda have signed a controversial deal to regulate and share the waters of River Nile, despite protests from downstream nations Sudan and Egypt. Ethiopia at the same time opened its first major dam on the Nile.
The countries of the Nile Basin have negotiated for 13 years to reach a new agreement regulating the use of Nile waters. The deal was to replace previous agreements, from 1929 and 1959, that give Egypt and Sudan control over about 90 percent of the Nile's water and was seen as a colonial relic unfavourable to upstream nations.
But the negotiations failed as Sudan and Egypt rejected proposals more favourable to the countries sources to Nile waters. Dismayed by the lengthy and fruitless negotiations, most upstream nations, led by Ethiopia and Uganda, decided to sign the agreement without the participation of Egypt and Sudan today.
The agreement thus was signed in Entebbe, Uganda, today, by officials from Nile source countries Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda. Kenya, while not signing the deal, issued a statement of support.
The new Nile agreement calls for experts to determine how to fairly share the Nile's water resources. It also opens up for a wider use of Nile waters by upstream nations, in theory opening up for projects that have been stalled for a decade due to the unclear legal situation.
But the agreement does not end the conflict, where Ethiopia and Egypt have been the main contenders. The lush and green mountains of Ethiopia contribute with 86 percent of the Nile's water, but Egyptian officials have already indicated they will take legal steps to prevent Ethiopia from widening its use of these waters as Cairo does not accept the new agreement.
The Egyptian government today reacted negatively to the signing, saying the new deal would not apply to Egypt or to Sudan. Cairo authorities announced they would take legal and diplomatic steps to stop the deal, saying the 1929 and 1959 agreements were still legally binding all parties.
Egypt's Water Minister in a statement added that his country in any case must be given special and wide rights to Nile waters. He recalled that the Nile provides Egypt with 96 percent of its water, while the other Nile Basin countries rely on the Nile for no more than three percent of their water needs. Less access to Nile waters would impede growth in Egypt, he added.
The Cairo government is already looking for diplomatic support to slash the new Nile deal as null and void. Diplomats from the European Union earlier this week had urged upstream nations not to sign the agreement without the support of Egypt and Sudan. Uganda and Ethiopia however hold Egypt is still welcome to sign the agreement.
Ethiopia, a country regularly experiencing droughts and famines, has been the main propagator of a new Nile Basin agreement, pointing to the fact that the country is strongly under-developed and needy in terms of water and electricity developments. Ethiopia and Egypt have a rivalry going back centuries, with officials in Cairo and Addis Ababa highly suspicious of each other.
For the complete article, please see afrol News.
Linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans across the Latin American landmass has often been presented as one of the holy grails of development for the region. While China’s idea of a ‘Nicaraguan Canal’ has made headlines globally, another major infrastructure project is in the works further south: the Bi-Oceanic Railway. The idea has already spurred transboundary environmental cooperation, but the public is still in the dark.
Using a progressive environmental security concept can help to tackle a range of environmental issues related to armed conflict, such as deforestation, loss of biodiversity, tensions over natural resources, conflict pollution, and damage to ecosystems. The environment can actually play a role in peacebuilding. This article briefly outlines why such an inclusive and environmental protection approach is needed and how it could be implemented.
Climate action and free trade have been perceived as contrary agendas for a long time. Despite more and more governments seeing tremendous potential for win-win outcomes, aligning trade and climate has become harder. This is due to changes in our current geopolitical landscape, as Christian Hübner explains in light of the upcoming G20 summit.
Human activity has caused the temperature of the Earth and its atmosphere to rise by about 1°C above pre-industrial levels, triggering fundamental changes to the planet’s physical and social landscapes. On 8 October an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that temperatures were rising faster than expected, and that 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels could occur as early as 2030.