Source: afrol News
14 May - Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda have signed a controversial deal to regulate and share the waters of River Nile, despite protests from downstream nations Sudan and Egypt. Ethiopia at the same time opened its first major dam on the Nile.
The countries of the Nile Basin have negotiated for 13 years to reach a new agreement regulating the use of Nile waters. The deal was to replace previous agreements, from 1929 and 1959, that give Egypt and Sudan control over about 90 percent of the Nile's water and was seen as a colonial relic unfavourable to upstream nations.
But the negotiations failed as Sudan and Egypt rejected proposals more favourable to the countries sources to Nile waters. Dismayed by the lengthy and fruitless negotiations, most upstream nations, led by Ethiopia and Uganda, decided to sign the agreement without the participation of Egypt and Sudan today.
The agreement thus was signed in Entebbe, Uganda, today, by officials from Nile source countries Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania and Rwanda. Kenya, while not signing the deal, issued a statement of support.
The new Nile agreement calls for experts to determine how to fairly share the Nile's water resources. It also opens up for a wider use of Nile waters by upstream nations, in theory opening up for projects that have been stalled for a decade due to the unclear legal situation.
But the agreement does not end the conflict, where Ethiopia and Egypt have been the main contenders. The lush and green mountains of Ethiopia contribute with 86 percent of the Nile's water, but Egyptian officials have already indicated they will take legal steps to prevent Ethiopia from widening its use of these waters as Cairo does not accept the new agreement.
The Egyptian government today reacted negatively to the signing, saying the new deal would not apply to Egypt or to Sudan. Cairo authorities announced they would take legal and diplomatic steps to stop the deal, saying the 1929 and 1959 agreements were still legally binding all parties.
Egypt's Water Minister in a statement added that his country in any case must be given special and wide rights to Nile waters. He recalled that the Nile provides Egypt with 96 percent of its water, while the other Nile Basin countries rely on the Nile for no more than three percent of their water needs. Less access to Nile waters would impede growth in Egypt, he added.
The Cairo government is already looking for diplomatic support to slash the new Nile deal as null and void. Diplomats from the European Union earlier this week had urged upstream nations not to sign the agreement without the support of Egypt and Sudan. Uganda and Ethiopia however hold Egypt is still welcome to sign the agreement.
Ethiopia, a country regularly experiencing droughts and famines, has been the main propagator of a new Nile Basin agreement, pointing to the fact that the country is strongly under-developed and needy in terms of water and electricity developments. Ethiopia and Egypt have a rivalry going back centuries, with officials in Cairo and Addis Ababa highly suspicious of each other.
For the complete article, please see afrol News.
We are entering the last days of the BCSC 2020, with insightful discussions on a number of climate security challenges still to come, as well as the launch of our “21st Century Diplomacy: Foreign Policy Is Climate Policy” essay series. Building on the high-level political Part I of BCSC 2020 back in July, this second part aims to bring together the field’s various actors in the realm of climate, development and security policy in one digital space to meet the strategic goals of sharing good practice on what works on the ground and help inform policy processes.
The novel corona virus has had the world in its grip for months. Most countries’ immediate response was to focus on internal issues: they resorted to nationalistic approaches, closing borders and even competing for equipment, even though a multilateral approach was necessary. In the longer term, will this crisis strengthen the ties between nations? Or exacerbate the flaws of today’s multilateralism?
The pandemic and racial justice protests call for justice and crisis preparedness – an opportunity also to act on climate change. Successfully taking advantage of this momentum, however, requires a climate strategy that ensures everyone has a voice and a stake. Here, Paul Joffe builds on a previous correspondence about how to begin that effort in this time of crisis.
Now in its second decade, the ambitious African Union–led restoration initiative known as the Great Green Wall has brought close to 18 million hectares of land under restoration since 2007, according to a status report unveiled by the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) at a virtual meeting on Monday, 7 September.