The pro-coal position of Poland’s energy ministry has thrown sand into the country’s climate diplomacy as COP24 president-designate Michał Kurtyka intensifies his diplomatic tour ahead of the United Nation’s annual climate meeting later this year in Katowice.
A pre-COP24 session, held in Krakow on Thursday (24 October), showed uneven progress being made across the various negotiation tracks identified to establish a “rulebook” for the implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change. “If negotiators fail to agree on adopting the implementation guidelines of the Paris Agreement, then it will be seen internationally as Poland’s failure,” a source close to the Polish government told EURACTIV under condition of anonymity. The government will try everything to make sure the guidelines are adopted despite internal attempts to weaken them in the process, the source added.
Coal-dependent Poland will preside over the COP24 on 3-14 December in Katowice. The Polish event is seen as the most important moment in international climate change negotiations since the Paris Agreement was adopted in 2015.
Michał Kurtyka, state secretary in the Polish ministry of environment, is the President-designate of COP24. As such, he will be pivotal in the success – or failure – of the UN climate conference, overseeing the proceedings and playing an important part in brokering compromises when problems appear. But his action is being undermined by the Polish energy minister, the source said. “On the one hand, you have the environment ministry that is fighting coal and is clearly focusing on the COP24, and on the other, you have the energy ministry that is promoting fossil fuels,” the source explained. “This gives a conflicting picture on the European and international stage as well as hampering Poland’s COP24 presidency diplomatic efforts,” the source added.
On 30 April, the Polish government nominated Michał Kurtyka to serve as the President of COP24. In July, Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki appointed him secretary of state in the environment ministry, a job he now occupies after serving for two and a half years as deputy minister for energy. “Since his appointment, Michał Kurtyka spent much time defending his position within the national government. Only in August did he set up a coordinating team for COP24,” the source explained. Yet, momentum is required and pressure on negotiators is mounting as the pre-COP ended on Thursday with little progress. “There is much detailed work to be done until the UN Climate Change Conference starts in Katowice on 3 December,” German state secretary in the environment ministry Jochen Flasbarth said in a statement after attending the Pre-COP24 meeting. While the climate protection targets are set at the national level, implementation, measuring and monitoring must be binding for all at the international level, he explained, adding that one of the important outstanding questions was how the national climate targets can be combined with international rules on transparency. “Transparency in implementation is the trustworthiness of international climate protection,” Flasbarth said.
On 22-24 October, ministers and heads of delegations from 37 countries met in Krakow in a bid to accelerate the negotiation process. The meeting took place amid rising climate urgency since the publication of a much-awaited report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which said efforts of an unprecedented scale, speed and magnitude were necessary in order to keep global warming below 1.5C. This means turning 300 pages or so of negotiating text into coherent implementation guidelines for the Paris Agreement, dubbed as the Paris “rulebook”. As it is, the agreement stipulates that each country must determine, plan, and regularly report on the contribution that it undertakes to mitigate global warming. It does not specify the tools or the legal framework under which such monitoring and reporting must be made. The text does, however, stipulate that each target should go beyond previously set objectives, thus integrating a ratcheting up process of the countries’ climate ambition.
[This article originally appeared on euractiv.com]
The longstanding dispute over water rights among Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia escalated in 2011 when Ethiopia began construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), in the absence of any agreement with downstream Egypt. The GERD dispute offers an alarming insight into just how dangerous future transboundary water disputes may become, particularly in the context of a changing climate.
Though focused on climate change, National Adaptation Plans offer important assessments of the risks a country faces and can be valuable in devising comprehensive pandemic response strategies.
Women in the region suffer disproportionately from climate impacts, but they also play an essential role in addressing climate change. With the right policy responses, it is possible to reduce security risks and empower women to better address the challenges they face.
As part of this year’s online World Water Week at Home, adelphi and IHE Delft convened the workshop "Water diplomacy: a tool for climate action?". The workshop reflected on the role that foreign policy can play in mitigating, solving and potentially preventing conflicts over the management of transboundary water resources, especially in a changing climate.