Published: 17 March 2011 - Upset by Turkish procrastination over the offshore section of the South Stream pipeline, Russia is warning that it may give up on the project altogether. But experts said Moscow could not afford to lose face over what is seen as the biggest political pipeline project of modern times.
Russia is considering the possibility of abandoning the South Stream gas pipeline project, which is designed to bring Russian gas to Europe by bypassing Ukraine, the Russian press writes today (17 March), quoting top officials in Moscow.
Talks held in Moscow yesterday (16 March) between Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdo?an ended with no agreement on building a crucial offshore section of South Stream in Turkish territorial waters.
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin said the Turkish authorities had been expected to approve the construction on 31 October 2010.
In the absence an agreement, Gazprom and the Russian government are currently studying various options for a "cheaper version" of South Stream, Sechin said, including replacing the pipeline with a project based on liquefied natural gas (LNG), to be transported by ship across the Black Sea.
Last week, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin demanded an investigation into the possibility of building an LNG plant on the Black Sea coast. According to Russian daily Kommersant, this latest development represents proof that the LNG project is not only seen as an additional option to South Stream, but could in fact replace it.
Turkey's delay in granting approval to the laying of pipes in its Black Sea territorial waters appears to represent a major obstacle to South Stream's construction. Turkey claims that it cannot give the go-ahead before receiving additional documentation from Gazprom, but Russia suspects that Ankara has other reasons for procrastinating.
Indeed, Moscow suspects Ankara is trying to trade its consent for a rebate on the price of gas imported from Russia.
In theory, Russia could alternatively lay the pipes through Ukrainian waters, but Kyiv is a staunch opponent of the project.
For the complete article, please see EurActiv.
The scope of national security is expanding beyond violent threats to encompass a broader array of dangers. In an article for World Politics Review, CFR's Stewart M. Patrick assesses the implications of COVID-19 and climate change for the theory and practice of national security.
Although there is no causality nor direct and automatic link between climate change and conflict, we can see that climate change can intensify conflict drivers and make it harder to find stability. The online workshop "Climate change, conflict and fragility: Increasing resilience against climate-fragility risks", organised by the European Peacebuilding Liaison Office (EPLO) and adelphi, looked into this complex relationship.
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous parallels have been drawn between this health crisis and the climate crisis. Science plays an important role in advising decision makers on how to ensure sustainable crisis management and a precautionary approach to avoid harmful repercussions, particularly where we do not yet know all the consequences of our actions. [...]
Decarbonisation won’t come as fast as the pandemic. But if fossil fuel exporters are not prepared for it, they will face an enduring crisis. The EU can help.