Published: 17 March 2011 - Upset by Turkish procrastination over the offshore section of the South Stream pipeline, Russia is warning that it may give up on the project altogether. But experts said Moscow could not afford to lose face over what is seen as the biggest political pipeline project of modern times.
Russia is considering the possibility of abandoning the South Stream gas pipeline project, which is designed to bring Russian gas to Europe by bypassing Ukraine, the Russian press writes today (17 March), quoting top officials in Moscow.
Talks held in Moscow yesterday (16 March) between Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdo?an ended with no agreement on building a crucial offshore section of South Stream in Turkish territorial waters.
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin said the Turkish authorities had been expected to approve the construction on 31 October 2010.
In the absence an agreement, Gazprom and the Russian government are currently studying various options for a "cheaper version" of South Stream, Sechin said, including replacing the pipeline with a project based on liquefied natural gas (LNG), to be transported by ship across the Black Sea.
Last week, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin demanded an investigation into the possibility of building an LNG plant on the Black Sea coast. According to Russian daily Kommersant, this latest development represents proof that the LNG project is not only seen as an additional option to South Stream, but could in fact replace it.
Turkey's delay in granting approval to the laying of pipes in its Black Sea territorial waters appears to represent a major obstacle to South Stream's construction. Turkey claims that it cannot give the go-ahead before receiving additional documentation from Gazprom, but Russia suspects that Ankara has other reasons for procrastinating.
Indeed, Moscow suspects Ankara is trying to trade its consent for a rebate on the price of gas imported from Russia.
In theory, Russia could alternatively lay the pipes through Ukrainian waters, but Kyiv is a staunch opponent of the project.
For the complete article, please see EurActiv.
In this interview, EcoPeace Directors Nada Majdalani (Palestine), Yana Abu-Taleb (Jordan) and Gidon Bromberg (Israel) explain why disengaging from a shared environment can aggravate the region’s security challenges.
At the conclusion of the 50th Pacific Islands Forum, Pacific leaders issued a Forum Communiqué and the ‘Kainaki II Declaration for Urgent Climate Change Action Now’ – the strongest collective statement the Forum has issued on climate change. Pacific leaders highlight the UN Secretary-General’s Climate Action Summit, the SAMOA Pathway Review, and 25th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 25) to the UNFCCC as “global turning points to ensure meaningful, measurable and effective climate change action”.
If ratified, the Mercosur-EU trade deal may reinforce the parties’ commitment to climate action. Yet, its potential relevance is weakened by a language that often stops short of concrete commitments, as well as political resistance.
Iraq is on the verge of an environmental breakdown, and climate change is not helping. The country's fragile environment and the increasing scarcity of natural resources — particularly water — are a result of poor environmental management, as well as several political and historical factors. However, as climate change impacts add to the existing pressures, the environmental collapse turns into a security issue.