Published: 17 March 2011 - Upset by Turkish procrastination over the offshore section of the South Stream pipeline, Russia is warning that it may give up on the project altogether. But experts said Moscow could not afford to lose face over what is seen as the biggest political pipeline project of modern times.
Russia is considering the possibility of abandoning the South Stream gas pipeline project, which is designed to bring Russian gas to Europe by bypassing Ukraine, the Russian press writes today (17 March), quoting top officials in Moscow.
Talks held in Moscow yesterday (16 March) between Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdo?an ended with no agreement on building a crucial offshore section of South Stream in Turkish territorial waters.
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin said the Turkish authorities had been expected to approve the construction on 31 October 2010.
In the absence an agreement, Gazprom and the Russian government are currently studying various options for a "cheaper version" of South Stream, Sechin said, including replacing the pipeline with a project based on liquefied natural gas (LNG), to be transported by ship across the Black Sea.
Last week, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin demanded an investigation into the possibility of building an LNG plant on the Black Sea coast. According to Russian daily Kommersant, this latest development represents proof that the LNG project is not only seen as an additional option to South Stream, but could in fact replace it.
Turkey's delay in granting approval to the laying of pipes in its Black Sea territorial waters appears to represent a major obstacle to South Stream's construction. Turkey claims that it cannot give the go-ahead before receiving additional documentation from Gazprom, but Russia suspects that Ankara has other reasons for procrastinating.
Indeed, Moscow suspects Ankara is trying to trade its consent for a rebate on the price of gas imported from Russia.
In theory, Russia could alternatively lay the pipes through Ukrainian waters, but Kyiv is a staunch opponent of the project.
For the complete article, please see EurActiv.
We are entering the last days of the BCSC 2020, with insightful discussions on a number of climate security challenges still to come, as well as the launch of our “21st Century Diplomacy: Foreign Policy Is Climate Policy” essay series. Building on the high-level political Part I of BCSC 2020 back in July, this second part aims to bring together the field’s various actors in the realm of climate, development and security policy in one digital space to meet the strategic goals of sharing good practice on what works on the ground and help inform policy processes.
The novel corona virus has had the world in its grip for months. Most countries’ immediate response was to focus on internal issues: they resorted to nationalistic approaches, closing borders and even competing for equipment, even though a multilateral approach was necessary. In the longer term, will this crisis strengthen the ties between nations? Or exacerbate the flaws of today’s multilateralism?
The pandemic and racial justice protests call for justice and crisis preparedness – an opportunity also to act on climate change. Successfully taking advantage of this momentum, however, requires a climate strategy that ensures everyone has a voice and a stake. Here, Paul Joffe builds on a previous correspondence about how to begin that effort in this time of crisis.
Now in its second decade, the ambitious African Union–led restoration initiative known as the Great Green Wall has brought close to 18 million hectares of land under restoration since 2007, according to a status report unveiled by the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) at a virtual meeting on Monday, 7 September.