In the lead-up to the current crisis in Mali, the impact of climate change should have been a part of the preparation process undertaken by policy makers. In 2011, Oxfam International raised its concern about the drought in Mali similar to the one that has plagued countries in the Horn of Africa. Furthermore, a number of studies by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) in 2006 highlighted the drought in Mali in the following way:
The second half of the 20th century has witnessed a dramatic reduction in mean annual rainfall throughout this region and an influx of migrants from nearby states is raising tensions. The drought also threatens to worsen the less-explored phenomenon of 'trapped populations’ in Mali.
Northern Mali and the surrounding Sahel region are burdened by chronic droughts as a result hundreds of thousands of people migrating to more suitable land and to the urban centres. This type of migration is often accompanied by dire consequences.
The challenge posed by climate change could lead Mali to greater threats and instability. Therefore, the international community should consider climate change a “threat multiplier” with the potential to intensify existing conflicts or even create new ones. Unless climate change adaptation is recognised as a viable solution to prevent and resolve conflicts in the face of high vulnerability to climate impacts, the changing climate in this region is likely to generate further conflict.
The recent crisis in Mali is one example of how climate change acts as a “threat multiplier” by exacerbating the existing tensions and triggering new conflict. The nomadic groups, such as the Tuaregs, who rely heavily on the land for their livelihood and feel that their interests are not protected by authority, rebelled over land and pasture, leading to inter-ethnic conflict. The possibility that Mali will face both catastrophic events, such as famines, and further conflict should be granted priority by both policy makers and international partners.
The consequences of climate change will affect a growing number of vulnerable people in this region. They will also exacerbate conflict in Mali unless vulnerable populations are assisted in building climate-resilient livelihoods. Communities and their local institutions must have effective links with national, regional, and international institutions. Adaptation should also be a priority and managed through coordination and cooperation among governments, civil society and the private sector, supported by international actors. Finally, the impact of climate change, which leads to more frequent and intense droughts, floods and desertification, will destabilise Mali in particular and the region in general unless urgent adaptation measures are taken now.
The full article is available here.
Ignoring cross border impacts of large infrastructure projects will spark conflict along rivers, argues Peter King. National level environmental impact assessments that ignore cross border impacts are likely to create conflict between countries.
Peat areas have played a pivotal role in conflicts globally, and have also been a point of contention during post-conflict recovery. Communities in Southeast Asia as well as in the countries of the Congo are facing challenges as finding political solutions for this problem.
On a visit at short notice to Germany, Russian President Vladimir Putin has met with German Chancellor Angela Merkel to discuss a range of bilateral and international issues, including the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine, and the future of the controversial gas pipeline project Nord Stream 2. The pair met for the second time within just three months to talk about the project.
Australia’s new prime minister will not walk away from the Paris climate agreement, although his new policies now make it unlikely the country will meet its emissions reduction goal. Ongoing trade talks with the EU could also hinge on how climate policy continues to develop.