Adaptation & Resilience
Climate Change
Oceania & Pacific
Dr Vigya Sharma

17-19 October 2016, Colombo, Sri Lanka

Last month I visited Colombo to speak at the 5th Asia-Pacific Climate Change Adaptation Forum. It was a remarkably successful event that focused particularly on ‘Bridging the Gaps in Policy & Practice’. More than 1000 representatives from across science, policy, national to local governments, multilateral donor agencies and various arms of the United Nations came together from over 50 nations. The sessions were organised under four major streams: Adaptation PlanningAdaptation FinancingClimate Resilient Development, and Multi-actor Cross Learning. The forum provided a great opportunity to share knowledge, build south-south cooperation and understand the full range of successes and failures that projects and programmes have experienced over the last decade in their efforts on climate adaptation.

The event opened with a high level plenary on “Why the focus on ‘living under 2°C?’” The ensuing discussion set the tone for the Forum’s theme on ‘Adapting and living below 2°C’. The panellists comprised a minister from a Small Island Developing State, three of the world’s best known researchers in the climate adaptation space, as well as a representative of Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment.

Across large parts of the Forum, it became clear that sustained climate financing, strategies to better engage the private sector and building the business case for adaptation remained critical challenges across most national and regional climate adaptation efforts. Other lesson highlights from the forum included: investing in the long-term; mainstreaming climate adaptation in national and local development planning; incentivising adaptation; and operationalising development plans that are risk-informed and inclusive.

What was missing from the forum however, was a focus on three particularly relevant areas of deliberation and action: a) inclusion of gender and other high at-risk groups at the grassroots level, b) climate justice and ethics, and c) education for children and investing in the future generation. There was a consistent gender imbalance even at the level of individual sessions, as several sessions offered limited opportunities for female participation in the form of moderator, chair or speakers. There was only one (out of 30+) session which, although discussing ecosystem-based adaptation approaches, had a clear focus on adaptation experiences along ‘gender-based roles and the marginalised’. While a significant proportion of the forum attendees were South Asian, women from the region were particularly underrepresented, as also mentioned here.

Overall, the forum provided valuable insights into the vast amount of work currently underway across Asia’s urban, rural, public and private sectors. At the same time, numerous challenges remain in both policy and practice as we move along pathways to adapting and living under 2°C. Hopefully, proceedings at the COP22 discussions in Marrakech currently underway will have picked on a number of these challenges to inform constructive options for policymakers, funders and several thousand others working with communities across Asia, Africa and the SIDS.

More information on the recently concluded APAN Forum is available here.

Dr Vigya Sharma is a postdoctoral research fellow with the Energy and Poverty Research Group, University of Queensland, Australia.

Climate Diplomacy
Global Issues
Dennis Tänzler, adelphi
It’s crunch time for the global climate security discourse. While the COVID-19 crisis remains the key present challenge, it’s time to take stock of where the debate stands on the security implications of climate change in the run-up to another debate in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) scheduled for July 2020. The Berlin Climate Security Conference series initiated a year ago with a call for action complements the UNSC debate...
Conflict Transformation
Global Issues

New report for policymakers provides an overview of the growing research on the links between climate change, security and peace. The synthesis identifies ten insights into climate-related security risks and lays the groundwork for the Global Climate Security Risk and Foresight Assessment, led by adelphi and PIK, that will be launched at the Berlin Climate and Security Conference.

Ariana Barrenechea, Sophia Christina Tomany and Teslin Maria Augustine, with contributions from Abhishek Raj, John Chrysostom Kamoga, Nadja Macherey, Sonia Ran and Varad Vatsal (Willy Brandt School of Public Policy, University of Erfurt)

In the wake of Germany’s United Nations Security Council (UNSC) presidency for the month of July 2020, its role in addressing climate change in the body gains even greater importance. A look into selected UNSC members that are also pushing the climate issue reveals: health and economic risks are key entry-points.

Dhanasree Jayaram, MAHE

It’s official: India has been elected as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) for 2021-22. Previously, the country has adopted a cautionary approach towards climate security. While it may not significantly shift its positions, global realities may trigger more openness, with an eye on multilateralism, rule of law and fairness.