17-19 October 2016, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Last month I visited Colombo to speak at the 5th Asia-Pacific Climate Change Adaptation Forum. It was a remarkably successful event that focused particularly on ‘Bridging the Gaps in Policy & Practice’. More than 1000 representatives from across science, policy, national to local governments, multilateral donor agencies and various arms of the United Nations came together from over 50 nations. The sessions were organised under four major streams: Adaptation Planning, Adaptation Financing, Climate Resilient Development, and Multi-actor Cross Learning. The forum provided a great opportunity to share knowledge, build south-south cooperation and understand the full range of successes and failures that projects and programmes have experienced over the last decade in their efforts on climate adaptation.
The event opened with a high level plenary on “Why the focus on ‘living under 2°C?’” The ensuing discussion set the tone for the Forum’s theme on ‘Adapting and living below 2°C’. The panellists comprised a minister from a Small Island Developing State, three of the world’s best known researchers in the climate adaptation space, as well as a representative of Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment.
Across large parts of the Forum, it became clear that sustained climate financing, strategies to better engage the private sector and building the business case for adaptation remained critical challenges across most national and regional climate adaptation efforts. Other lesson highlights from the forum included: investing in the long-term; mainstreaming climate adaptation in national and local development planning; incentivising adaptation; and operationalising development plans that are risk-informed and inclusive.
What was missing from the forum however, was a focus on three particularly relevant areas of deliberation and action: a) inclusion of gender and other high at-risk groups at the grassroots level, b) climate justice and ethics, and c) education for children and investing in the future generation. There was a consistent gender imbalance even at the level of individual sessions, as several sessions offered limited opportunities for female participation in the form of moderator, chair or speakers. There was only one (out of 30+) session which, although discussing ecosystem-based adaptation approaches, had a clear focus on adaptation experiences along ‘gender-based roles and the marginalised’. While a significant proportion of the forum attendees were South Asian, women from the region were particularly underrepresented, as also mentioned here.
Overall, the forum provided valuable insights into the vast amount of work currently underway across Asia’s urban, rural, public and private sectors. At the same time, numerous challenges remain in both policy and practice as we move along pathways to adapting and living under 2°C. Hopefully, proceedings at the COP22 discussions in Marrakech currently underway will have picked on a number of these challenges to inform constructive options for policymakers, funders and several thousand others working with communities across Asia, Africa and the SIDS.
More information on the recently concluded APAN Forum is available here.
Dr Vigya Sharma is a postdoctoral research fellow with the Energy and Poverty Research Group, University of Queensland, Australia.
Stories of clear skies and wildlife conquering urban areas might provide much needed comfort during these uncertain times as the health crisis unfolds. But in Brazil, where climate and environmental issues already lack attention and resources, the pandemic underscores the next crisis.
Solutions to the current COVID-19 crisis need to be aligned to those of the climate crisis for a global transformation towards more sustainability, resilience, equity, and justice. Climate diplomacy has the tools to achieve these objectives simultaneously.
In the central Sahel, states are mobilising to combat the impact of climate change as way of reducing conflict. But to respond suitably to growing insecurity, it is important to look beyond a simplistic equation linking global warming and resource scarcity to outbreaks of violence.
Between food losses and critical shortages, COVID-19 and climate change are testing a food system that critics say has lost its resilience to crises.