India occupies a precarious position in the global climate change order. It trails only China, the United States, and the European Union in total emissions, but per capita emissions are far lower. India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi won the 2014 elections on a strong pro-development platform and continues to wave this flag at all levels, making energy security a major priority and pledging to expand the country’s coal mining industry. But he also insists he will work with the international community on mitigating climate change. During a recent visit to France, Germany, and Canada, he declared, “India will set the agenda for the upcoming Conference of Parties” in Paris this fall.
The Paris conference is widely expected to be the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change process’s best chance to produce a universal agreement among nations. It won’t be binding – each government has been asked to contribute pledges, or Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, which they create themselves – but the theory is that any agreement is better than no agreement.
The Indian government chose not to submit its contributions by the loose deadline of March 31. Moreover, when they do come, they are expected to stress targets that can only be achieved with financial and technological assistance from richer countries. Modi’s statements about leading the Paris summit may therefore sound rhetorical, but what he has made clear is that he does not want the focus of the climate change negotiations to be on emissions cuts alone. Instead, he prefers to push a clean energy agenda – a concern as well as a demand that he raised with leaders while in France, Germany, and Canada.
Energy Access for All?
Not only is India heavily dependent on other countries for energy, but nearly 400 million Indians – equivalent to more than half the population of Europe – do not have access to electricity. Modi’s goal is to make the country self-reliant and set in motion a “saffron revolution,” following India’s green and white revolutions and invocating his party’s color, aggressively expanding nuclear, solar, wind, and biomass energy generation, while improving efficiency and conservation. “Generate More, Use Rationally, Waste Less,” as the slogan goes.
The goal, Modi says, is that every household will have uninterrupted 24-hour power by the time India celebrates its 75th year of independence in 2022. As a part of this target, India plans to quadruple its renewable power capacity to 175 gigawatts over the same time period, according to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. 100 gigawatts are to come from solar, 60 gigawatts from wind, 10 gigawatts from biomass, and 5 gigawatts from hydro.
These targets are also India’s main bargaining chip at the climate negotiations. Although several questions remain, such as the lack of vital infrastructure (the existing power grid is in poor shape) and land acquisition, such an ambitious target indicates the government’s keenness to work towards definite renewable energy goals.
For the complete article, please see New Security Beat.
Linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans across the Latin American landmass has often been presented as one of the holy grails of development for the region. While China’s idea of a ‘Nicaraguan Canal’ has made headlines globally, another major infrastructure project is in the works further south: the Bi-Oceanic Railway. The idea has already spurred transboundary environmental cooperation, but the public is still in the dark.
Using a progressive environmental security concept can help to tackle a range of environmental issues related to armed conflict, such as deforestation, loss of biodiversity, tensions over natural resources, conflict pollution, and damage to ecosystems. The environment can actually play a role in peacebuilding. This article briefly outlines why such an inclusive and environmental protection approach is needed and how it could be implemented.
Climate action and free trade have been perceived as contrary agendas for a long time. Despite more and more governments seeing tremendous potential for win-win outcomes, aligning trade and climate has become harder. This is due to changes in our current geopolitical landscape, as Christian Hübner explains in light of the upcoming G20 summit.
Human activity has caused the temperature of the Earth and its atmosphere to rise by about 1°C above pre-industrial levels, triggering fundamental changes to the planet’s physical and social landscapes. On 8 October an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that temperatures were rising faster than expected, and that 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels could occur as early as 2030.