Adaptation & Resilience
Climate Change
Climate Diplomacy
Global Issues
Karl Mathiesen

The world’s 49 most climate vulnerable countries have called on the G20 to finally set a date – preferably 2020 – for a phase out of fossil fuel subsidies, in a communiqué issued at the end of its meeting in Washington.

[This article originally appeared on climatechangenews.com]

The richest 20 nations have pledged to phase out “inefficient” fossil fuel subsidies over the “medium term”. But campaigners and investors have urged them to follow the G7 and set a deadline.

Those calls were repeated on Sunday by the finance ministers of the Climate Vulnerable Forum (CVF), a political grouping of the countries that are the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change because of geography and poverty.

In a communiqué issued at the end of its weekend meeting in Washington DC, the group called “for market distorting fossil fuel production subsidies to be removed immediately and no later than 2020, and urge the G20 to set such as adopt a clear timeframe for fossil fuel subsidy elimination”.

The CVF meeting, which was chaired by Ethiopia, said subsidies for fossil fuels could only be justified when they provided real benefits to the poor.

The G20, which represent the world’s largest economies, still pours hundreds of billions of dollars into the fossil fuel industry each year through tax breaks, direct finance and other forms of support. Definitions of what constitutes a subsidy are hotly contended, but the OECD has issued an estimate – which is considered conservative – that its member states give the industry support worth $160-200bn each year.

In a side meeting, representatives of the G20 met with the CVF, where the importance of a fossil fuel subsidy phase out was expressed.

G20 heads of state will meet in Hamburg in July. The German presidency is expected to prioritise climate change at the meeting, despite expected recalcitrance on the subject from Donald Trump’s new US administration.

The Paris climate agreement, struck in 2015, commits countries to limit global warming to “well below” 2C and pursue efforts “to limit the temperature increase to 1.5C”. As the most vulnerable countries, the CVF have the most immediate interest in keeping global temperatures below the latter, lower goal.

Macaya Hayes, ambassador of Costa Rica to the US, said: “For vulnerable countries, the 1.5C limit is a matter of survival. It requires immediate and swift action by the global community, and above all, the major industrial powers.”

Also occupying the minds of the most vulnerable countries is a promise of $100bn of finance that rich countries have promised to deliver each year to the poor world by 2020 to help them cope with climate change.

In a thinly-veiled reference the US government’s budget proposal to cease climate finance flows, the CVF communiqué said: “Pulling resources from climate protection will create economic instability. Investing in climate action is necessary and critical to inclusive development and economic growth”.

The meeting of the CVF also welcomed new members, with Colombia, Lebanon, the Gambia, Palestine and Samoa joining the forum. The Marshall Islands was elected to take over as chair from Ethiopia in 2018.


Climate Change
Climate Diplomacy
Energy
Finance
Minerals & Mining
Private Sector
Sustainable Transformation
Technology & Innovation
Global Issues
Asia
Lou del Bello

As the world's biggest polluter, what China decides to do with its energy policy matters to the whole planet. And while progress on the domestic front has rightly won Beijing praise from climate scientists, China is the world's largest funder of coal plants overseas. Is the country employing double standards?

Biodiversity & Livelihoods
Climate Change
Climate Diplomacy
Conflict Transformation
Development
Early Warning & Risk Analysis
Security
Sustainable Transformation
Global Issues
Stella Schaller, adelphi

To shift humanity onto a sustainable path and secure peace, transformative change is required – globally. The UN’s 17 SDGs serve as critical guardrails. But what is the role of foreign policy in the implementation of these goals and what are the side-effects that diplomacy must be aware of? At the UN High-level Political Forum, experts analysed the geopolitical implications of the SDGs and discussed why foreign policy need to engage with them.

Biodiversity & Livelihoods
Climate Change
Environment & Migration
Land & Food
Security
Water
Global Issues
Planetary Security Initiative

“Climate change is inextricably linked to some of the most pressing security challenges of our time,” said Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed, echoing many permanent and temporary members of the United Nations Security Council. This debate, brought forward under the Swedish Presidency of the Council, aimed at bringing forth the nexus between climate change and security, not only in a context-specific manner like previously acknowledged but for the globe as a whole.

Biodiversity & Livelihoods
Climate Change
Climate Diplomacy
Early Warning & Risk Analysis
Environment & Migration
Land & Food
Security
Water
Global Issues
Stella Schaller, adelphi

Understanding climate risks is crucial to ensuring effective and sustainable conflict prevention. On 11 July, Sweden will hold the first meeting in the UN Security Council since 2011 on climate-related security risks, to better understand how climate change impacts security, and enhance UN responses across the conflict cycle.