Pope Francis’ Encyclical Letter “Laudato Si”, published on 18 June 2015, is a moral plea for action against climate change and environmental degradation. Besides laying out the Pope’s critical stance on the ecological, spiritual and economic motives to ‘save our common home’, it also sends a central message to policy makers that: international political climate action is more important now than ever.
In Chapter Five the Pope outlines the building blocks of the “Dialogue on the Environment in the International Community”. Climate change has to be seen in the context of global interdependence. Local and regional developments linked to climate change have a global effect and entail a responsibility towards those who are and will be most affected. Hence, solutions need to be multilateral and considered from a global perspective.
“Diplomacy”, according to the Pope, “takes on new importance in the work of developing international strategies which can anticipate serious problems affecting us all.” A determined international process built on the mutual respect of sovereignty is central to supplement action by local authorities.
This strong case for climate diplomacy can fall on fertile ground. Indeed, on the occasion of the second European Climate Diplomacy Day - the day before the Papal Encyclical was presented - the EU’s High Representative and Vice-President Federica Mogherini made a clear statement that: tackling climate change is both a national security as well as a moral imperative.
As the pressure for a new international climate agreement to be reached at the Paris COP 21 in December is high, the Pope’s Encyclical with its strong moral rationale can assist policy makers as an added, convincing narrative in making the case for decisive and timely action.
As the world's biggest polluter, what China decides to do with its energy policy matters to the whole planet. And while progress on the domestic front has rightly won Beijing praise from climate scientists, China is the world's largest funder of coal plants overseas. Is the country employing double standards?
To shift humanity onto a sustainable path and secure peace, transformative change is required – globally. The UN’s 17 SDGs serve as critical guardrails. But what is the role of foreign policy in the implementation of these goals and what are the side-effects that diplomacy must be aware of? At the UN High-level Political Forum, experts analysed the geopolitical implications of the SDGs and discussed why foreign policy need to engage with them.
“Climate change is inextricably linked to some of the most pressing security challenges of our time,” said Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed, echoing many permanent and temporary members of the United Nations Security Council. This debate, brought forward under the Swedish Presidency of the Council, aimed at bringing forth the nexus between climate change and security, not only in a context-specific manner like previously acknowledged but for the globe as a whole.
Understanding climate risks is crucial to ensuring effective and sustainable conflict prevention. On 11 July, Sweden will hold the first meeting in the UN Security Council since 2011 on climate-related security risks, to better understand how climate change impacts security, and enhance UN responses across the conflict cycle.