Dennis Tänzler, adelphi
Reichstag, Bundestag, EU, Germany, flag
Reichstag builing, which houses the German parliament, in Berlin | © Bernd Marczak/Pixabay.com

Several climate security studies have assessed the risks of climate change to security and examined potential foreign policy responses, but the connection between climate change and foreign policy remains underexplored. The new Climate Diplomacy Report of the German Foreign Office takes up the challenge.

There are probably hundreds of climate security studies out there to assess the risks that climate change poses to security and potential foreign policy responses for addressing them. There are not too many government strategy papers out there, defining what linking climate change and foreign policy actually means. One of the most in-depth approaches to date was the European Commission’ work back in 2008 and 2011 to examine the relevance of climate change for security and to outline how climate diplomacy could be further strengthened.

However, in December 2019, the German Federal Foreign Office produced a “Climate Diplomacy Report” outlining different elements that can and should characterise climate-related foreign policy. In light of the international climate negotiations having stalling once more at COP26 in Madrid, it is worth reading the introductory text that highlights why diplomats should pay more attention to the climate crisis. It states that foreign policy needs: “[..] to support other countries and international organisations in dealing with the impact of climate change and in the transformation towards a climate-neutral economy, thus injecting impetus into the entire spectrum of our bilateral and multilateral relations.”

This framing of the issue not only highlights the goals of the Paris Agreement; it pushes supporting other countries’ transformations towards carbon neutrality to the forefront of activities to promote a preventive climate diplomacy. This is the first of six areas described in the report – the others being more conventional topics related to climate and security, such as stabilisation, post-conflict peacebuilding and humanitarian assistance, along with the need to deal with the geopolitical shifts that will emerge due to both climate change and climate policy.

Reading through the report, three main observations come to mind:

  1. Climate foreign policy is more than climate security policy: The report stresses that foreign policy needs to protect the legacy of the Paris Agreement by guiding the great transformation process and by pushing for renewed momentum in 2020. It highlights the window of opportunity to strive for more ambitious climate action this year, especially during the German EU Presidency. In addition, it maintains that bilateral and multilateral contacts should be used to enter into a debate with major countries (i.e.: major emitters) that are taking an increasingly critical stance on the climate issue. What is remarkable is the strong message on coal phase-out. Although the words are not used explicitly, the report stresses that diplomatic efforts should focus on the “need to upgrade existing infrastructure, including early decommissioning of existing infrastructure”.
  2. Where is adaptation support in the ‘year of adaptation’? The 2019 New York Climate Summit saw the announcement of a Year of Action on adaptation, with a high-level conference tentatively scheduled for October 2020. In addition, the report at no point explicitly mentions the strengthening of resilience, despite this being an important objective for climate diplomacy. The report does underline the importance of strengthening early-warning capacities and fostering climate policy implementation on the ground – also in conflict-prone regions – and this will, of course, contribute to improving adaptive capacities. However, additional recognition of the complex processes linked to conflict-sensitive adaptation would be helpful to avoid a disconnect with other relevant processes in the international climate policy landscape.
  3. Let’s start a conservation on financing climate diplomacy action. Financing is not a major focus of the climate diplomacy report, despite several relevant links being made. German climate foreign policy is funding around 100 projects per year and it is involved in the development of pioneering instruments such as forecast-based financing for risk financing to support humanitarian assistance. Finally, the report highlights an important element in a comprehensive climate diplomacy approach by any EU Member State – the future design of the EU’s 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and the need implement its horizontal climate target of at least 25 percent. In this context, the report also draws attention to the important role of trade and economic relations in guiding a climate-friendly transformation process. Here in fact are the major entry points for an ambitious foreign climate policy – and it will be worth tracking progress here, as well as in the other six fields of action of climate diplomacy.

Climate Diplomacy
Global Issues
Noah Gordon, adelphi

The best resource for all of our 21st Century Diplomacy: Foreign Policy Is Climate Policy content is the official website, hosted by the Wilson Center and adelphi. But the ECC editors are also collecting the topics here for eager readers.

Land & Food
Security
Global Issues
Compiled by Raquel Munayer and Stella Schaller, adelphi

What exactly triggers food riots? At which point does climate change come in? And what can we learn from analyzing the lack and impotence of government action in conflict areas? In our Editor’s Pick, we share 10 case studies from the interactive ECC Factbook that address the connections between food, the environment and conflict. They show how agriculture and rural livelihoods can affect stability in a country, which parties are involved in food conflicts and what possible solutions are on the table.

Ryan McNamara, New Security Beat

Tensions in the South China Sea increased last April when a Chinese coast guard ship sank a Vietnamese fishing boat near the Paracel Islands—a fiercely disputed territory in the South China Sea. Disputes over island territories in the region have endured for decades, with China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei all making overlapping territorial claims. The region is rich in natural resources and biodiversity, holding vast fish stocks and an estimated 11 billion barrels of oil and 190 cubic feet of natural gas.

Early Warning & Risk Analysis
Asia
Dhanasree Jayaram, MAHE

Without a coordinated strategy to tackle flooding disasters beyond the traditional infrastructural measures and river water sharing agreements, South Asia’s woes will continue in the future.